🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to ban social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are monitoring intently to see if this approach will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

Across Europe Movement

Throughout Europe, a growing group of nations are exploring comparable measures.

• The Danish government plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our kids' youth". The policy may be passed soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to verify the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have stated that an Australian-model ban remains "one of the options on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the president has urged the legislature to enact a proposal increasing the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has suggested a comparable move, including an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The administration in the Netherlands has recommended families to prevent their children from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a advisory statement calling for a ban for under-16s except if guardian approval is given. While it warns of the "compulsive" design of these apps, the move does not create binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a good foundation," commented the parliamentarian behind the measure.

The UK: A Cautious Stance

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a potential ban, arguing that "no measure is being dismissed" but insisting any action must be "grounded in robust data".

Last year, interest built behind a bill to introduce restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was in the end modified. Instead, the government pledged to investigate the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced warnings. One foundation set up by the relatives of a young person who died after viewing harmful online content suggests that a simple age ban may not make platforms safer and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people become eligible.

"This ban is a response to the failure of the social media companies to design tools that are safe and fit for minors," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

America: A Fragmented Picture

Across America, legislation is primarily occurring at the regional level due to country-wide gridlock.

• The state of Utah demands guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has passed a rule capping under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with additional time needing adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced bills mandating parental consent for minors to set up social media accounts.

Even with bipartisan support and calls from certain politicians to copy Australia's example, a nationwide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Perspectives

Outside of these regions, additional countries are also considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies adopt a more cautious position. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans have downsides and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for marginalized youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to prioritize user protection.

As this global discussion unfolds, the policies of this nation and several other countries show that governments globally are no longer willing to delay for platforms to act voluntarily.