🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to restart atomic discussions with Washington on condition that it is handled with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's foreign minister has stated.

Abbas Araghchi stated solely negotiations worked, and revealed recent overtures had been made by go-betweens to restart discussions with the US government. He said Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran was not yet able to permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Course

The foreign minister is navigating a complex course since Iran does not want be perceived to be proceeding from a position of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had arisen stronger defensively and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Discussions Abruptly Terminated

The earlier sessions of talks between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with the US president claiming the facilities had been obliterated. Following this, EU nations employed their authority to reimpose UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Perfect Agreement Proposed

Tehran representatives said they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the nuclear fuel concern in previous talks, when it was settled an local partnership with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to assert triumph since domestic enrichment would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the talks that American atomic experts could work on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Officials claimed three times they had reached agreement with Trump's special envoy the American negotiator only for the agreement to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".

Present Position

Iranian officials declared the consortium offer was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the offer could be resurrected in various formats if discussions resume.

Trump recently claimed he had been getting signals that Iran desired to resume discussions, but confidentially Iranian officials state they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from the United States either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been criticized of inactivity in the face of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran says negotiations is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his address to the forum, aimed to portray the US as a hegemonic power that abuses the concept of worldwide standards, the foreign minister declared the two-week conflict revealed the conflict could not be ended by military means. He said the strikes started with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were carried out with complete American awareness and collaboration, making confidence difficult to reestablish.

Dialogue Continues the Ultimate Answer

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had fled negotiations; it was America and the Western nations that had repeatedly tried to dictate their will during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be alive and remains the final resolution to address disagreements, but its criteria, guidelines and fundamentals must be adhered to."

"If they speak to the nation of Iran with the approach of dignity and respect, they will obtain a reply in the same tone."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Iranian officials as the struggle of restoration and recovery, Araghchi stated he was confident Iran's military capacities "are considerably enhanced than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We gained numerous insights from this conflict; we have discovered our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the opponent."

He added: "We managed to survive this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they intended to destroy, remains in place. The sites and machinery, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but failed to destroy. The Iranian people have become stronger, more integrated, and more endorsing of the administration and the state in the wake of this attack."